The Industrial Stormwater General Permit No. 1200-Z (1200-Z permit) covers a broad
range of industry throughout Oregon that discharge stormwater to rivers, streams and other
surface waters. The Industrial Stormwater General Permit No. 1200-COLS (1200-COLS
permit) covers industries that discharge to the Columbia Slough Watershed in the Portland metro area. There are about 773 facilities registered under the 1200-Z permit and 139
facilities registered under the1200-COLS permit.
These permits regulate various pollutants from industrial activities that may be
discharged in stormwater during rain and snow events. The stormwater from industrial
activities discharges to rivers and streams, or to storm drains that eventually discharge to
rivers and streams. Stormwater often contains pollutants that may harm aquatic life and
their habitat. The permits require facilities to implement best management practices to
reduce pollutants in stormwater and to meet benchmarks that measure the success of these
management practices.
These permits expire every five years. DEQ renewed the 1200-Z permit in 2002 and
2007. The current 1200-Z permit became effective on July 1, 2007 and expires on June
30, 2012. DEQ renewed the 1200-COLS permit in 2006. The current 1200-COLS permit
became effective on September 1, 2006 and expires on August 31, 2011.
In 2007 and 2008, two environmental advocacy groups, Northwest Environmental
Defense Center (NEDC) and Columbia Riverkeeper, challenged the current permits’
validity under the Federal Clean Water Act. DEQ settled the legal challenge and as part of
the settlement agreement agreed to revise the permits.(1) Under the settlement agreement,
DEQ agreed to:
• Issue new permits based on the EPA Multi-Sector General Permit (EPA’s permit)
for industrial stormwater discharges issued in September 2008.
• Convene an advisory committee to provide input on the proposed changes to
the permits. Specifically, DEQ agreed to discuss the following issues with the
committee:
-Evaluate whether facilities should monitor their discharge at least once a
year (i.e., not allowing a monitoring waiver for facilities that consistently
meet benchmarks).
- Evaluate the consequences for not meeting benchmarks.
- Evaluate increasing monitoring to characterize the pollutants in industrial
stormwater discharges.
• Retain the public notice and comment provisions in the current Oregon permits
and continue to review stormwater pollution control plans.
In May 2010, DEQ and NEDC and Columbia Riverkeeper amended the settlement agreement to
provide additional time for DEQ to develop water quality-based metals benchmarks for copper, lead, and
zinc.(2)
In June 2009, DEQ convened an advisory committee comprised of representatives of affected
industries, small businesses, municipalities, environmental groups and stormwater consultants. The
committee met sixteen times from June 2009 to April 2011 and provided input to DEQ on the proposed
changes to the permits.
DEQ is proposing significant changes to the permits. DEQ made these changes based on settlement
agreements with NEDC and Columbia Riverkeeper, advisory committee input and the evaluation of the
federal EPA MSGP permit. These changes include the following:
• Significantly lowering the metals benchmarks for copper, lead and zinc based on an evaluation of
the state’s waters.
• Requiring certain industries that are not consistently achieving the benchmarks to hire a professional
engineer or certified engineering geologist to design their stormwater plan and identify best
available technologies to reduce pollutants.
• Adding more pollutant monitoring:
- Industries that discharge to impaired waters that are not meeting the state water quality
standards will monitor for impairment pollutants on DEQ’s 303(d) list and take corrective
actions if these pollutants are present in their discharge.
- Industries will monitor for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and a broader suite
of metals (cadmium, chromium and nickel) to determine if they are present in industrial
stormwater. Certain industries will also monitor for industry specific benchmarks.
• Adding precision to sample collection requirements. If possible, industries will collect grab composite
samples, sample during first rain event after September 1st and within first 12 hours of each
storm (maximum of four events per year).
• Improving efficiency and effectiveness in the reporting process. This includes specifying events
which require submission of revised stormwater plans.
The proposed permits contain requirements for new and existing discharges to impaired waters with or
without EPA approved TMDLs.
• New dischargers are only eligible for discharge authorization if they demonstrate (and document)
that there is either no exposure of stormwater to the pollutant for which the water is
impaired, or the impairment pollutant is not present at the facility, or that the discharge is not
expected to cause or contribute to a water quality standards exceedance.
• For new and existing discharges to impaired waters with EPA approved TMDLs, DEQ will
presume that compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit complies with the
TMDL unless a Waste Load Allocation (WLA) is established for industrial stormwater discharges.
DEQ conducted a review on Oregon’s TMDLs to determine if stormwater discharges
were considered in the source assessment of the TMDL and whether stormwater was identified
as a significant source.(3) During source assessment, the TMDL program evaluates the
significant sources of the impairment. Typically, stormwater is not considered a significant
source because of the pollutant/impairment (for example, temperature) the TMDL is addressing.
Most TMDLs either do not mention stormwater or specifically state that stormwater is
not considered a significant source of the impairment.
• If a WLA is established, DEQ will evaluate whether additional requirements are necessary
to ensure the discharge is consistent with the TMDL. If the water is impaired but there is no
completed TMDL, the discharger is required to control its discharge as necessary to meet applicable
water quality standards and to conduct routine monitoring for the pollutants for which
the waterbody is impaired.
DEQ is proposing significantly lower metals benchmarks for copper, lead and zinc. The lead and zinc
benchmark values were determined using risk-based modeling with conservative inputs for parameters such
as hardness and metals concentrations in the receiving waters. DEQ used a technology-based approach
to determine the proposed copper benchmark because results of risk-based modeling yielded copper
benchmark values that were very low and would not be regularly achieved by active treatment.
TABLE OF DEQ's PROPPOSED BENCHMARKS
The industrial stormwater general permits are based on an adaptive management approach where
permit registrants monitor their stormwater discharge, evaluate the effectiveness of their control measures,
and take corrective actions to ensure they are controlling the industrial pollutants that are exposed to
stormwater to achieve the benchmarks in the permit. DEQ evaluated the corrective action requirements
in the current permits and as part of the settlement agreement agreed to seek feedback from the advisory
committee on developing permit requirements for facilities that repeatedly fail to meet benchmarks. Based
on these discussion and evaluations, DEQ is proposing changes to the corrective action requirements in the
permit.
THE PROPOSED PERMITS INCLUDE THE NEW CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS THAT:
• Focus on those facilities that consistently fail to meet the statewide benchmarks (Tier II) and
require that these facilities install the best available technology to reduce the pollutants below
benchmarks. These facilities must hire a licensed professional engineer or certified engineering
geologist to add scrutiny to the selection of control measures to address the pollutants of
concern and revise the SWPCPs.
• Clarify the timeline and corrective actions facilities must take if they exceed benchmarks.
• Provide flexibility for facilities to evaluate all available control measures such as operational,
structural or treatment BMPs to address the pollutants of concern. Facilities should first
consider source control measures, if possible, before implementing more resource intensive
BMPs such as installing a treatment system.• Promote the use of volume reduction measures such as low impact development practices to
reduce stormwater flow and control the mass load of pollutants that enter the receiving stream.
• Promote innovations in stormwater management.
• Improve the quality of industrial stormwater discharge over time.
DEQ is proposing that a more rigorous approach for facilities that routinely exceed the statewide
benchmarks in the proposed permits. These facilities must meet the Tier II corrective action requirements.
To provide added scrutiny of the BMPs needed to control the pollutant(s) that are above the benchmark(s),
DEQ is proposing a licensed professional engineer or certified engineering geologist conduct a
comprehensive review of control measures that are technologically available and economically achievable
in light of best industry practice. The goal of these added controls is to eliminate or reduce the pollutant
concentration(s) in future discharges below the benchmarks in new permits. The updated SWPCP will
identify the selected control measures and provide the rationale and analysis supporting that the selected
control measures are technologically available and economically achievable in light of best industry
practice in the engineering report. DEQ is proposing that these facilities implement the selected BMPs
within 18 months.
DEQ is proposing to the following changes to the monitoring requirements:
• Types of pollutants monitored: Expanding the number of pollutant parameters that permit registrants
must monitor in stormwater runoff. In addition to the statewide benchmarks retained
from the current permit, certain registrants must monitor pollutants based on their industrial
sector and impairment pollutants based on discharges to impaired waterbodies. DEQ is also
proposing that facilities monitor additional pollutants (PAHs, chromium, nickel and cadmium)
to identify if these pollutant sources are commonly present in industrial stormwater and to
inform future permit development.
• Timing of sample collection: If practicable, facilities must collect a seasonal first flush sample
of the “first fall storm event” after September 1 that produces a discharge from the facility.
Also, if practicable, facilities are also required to collect samples within the first twelve hours
of the storm event.
• Sampling Method: For the first two years of coverage under the permit, grab composite sampling
will be used to collect samples if practicable. Facilities will collect three grab samples
and combine them into one sample that is then analyzed by the laboratory. Utilizing the grab
composite monitoring method will yield more representative analytical results than individual
grab sampling.
The public comment period closed on June 16, 2011. DEQ plans to issue these permits by September
1, 2011. The 1200-COLS permit will become effective on September 1, 2011. The 1200-Z permit will
be become effective on July 1, 2012. Once the permits are issued, there will be a period of time where
facilities will renew their coverage under the new permits. The draft permits and the factsheet that explains
the changes to the permits are located on DEQ’s website at http://www.deq.state.or.us/wq/stormwater/industrial.htm.
For Additional Information: Jenine Camilleri, DEQ Stormwater Coordinator, 503/ 229-6775.
by Jenine Camilleri, DEQ Stormwater Coordinator (Portland)
Issue #467 / June 2011
Jenine Camilleri is a Stormwater Coordinator for Oregon Department of Environmental Quality working out
of the Headquarters office in Portland, Oregon. She started in this position in January 2006. She has been
working on the revisions to the NPDES Industrial Stormwater General Permits. She has worked for DEQ
since 2000. She worked for six years as an Environmental Law Specialist in DEQ’s Office of Compliance and
Enforcement. She received a JD from Northwestern School of Law at Lewis and Clark College in Portland,
Oregon and a BS in Environmental Policy Studies at Michigan State University.